GeMS validation of GERMA2025.1.gdb

File written by GeMS_ValidateDatabase.py, version of 02/19/2025
Mon Dec 22 16:09:23 2025
Runtime parameters
Database path: C:\Users\WVINCETT\Desktop\MD_2022_Germantown2025.1_1-2-submittal\MD_2022_Germantown2025.1_1-2\MD_2022_Germantown2025.1_1-2-database\GERMA2025.1.gdb
Output directory: C:\Users\WVINCETT\Desktop\MD_2022_Germantown2025.1_1-2-submittal
Metadata file: None
Check embedded metadata: False
Skip topology check: False
Refresh GeoMaterialDict: False
Delete extra rows in Glossary and DataSources: False
Compact GDB: True

This database is LEVEL 3 COMPLIANT.

Check Metadata option was skipped. Be sure to have prepared valid metadata and check this option to produce a complete report.
This file should be accompanied by GERMA2025.1.gdb-ValidationErrors.html and a metadata summary from mp in the same directory.

If this database will be submitted to the NGMDB, it also needs to be accompanied by a reviewed Geologic Names report that includes identification of any suggested modifications to Geolex. Use the Geologic Names Check tool to generate that report or provide other documentation of a review.

Back to Top

Contents

Compliance Criteria
Warnings
Content not specified in GeMS schema
Occurrence of MapUnits in DMU, feature datasets, or geopackage tables
Contents of Nonspatial Tables
DataSources
DescriptionOfMapUnits
Glossary
Database Inventory

Compliance Criteria

LEVEL 1

Criteria for a LEVEL 1 GeMS database are: Databases with a variety of schema may meet these criteria. This script cannot confirm LEVEL 1 compliance.

LEVEL 2--MINIMALLY COMPLIANT

A LEVEL 2 GeMS database is accompanied by a peer-reviewed Geologic Names report, including identification of suggested modifications to Geolex, and meets the following criteria:
2.1 Has required elements: nonspatial tables DataSources, DescriptionOfMapUnits, GeoMaterialDict; feature dataset GeologicMap with feature classes ContactsAndFaults and MapUnitPolys PASS
2.2 Required fields within required elements are present and correctly defined PASS
2.3 All MapUnitPolys and ContactsAndFaults based feature classes obey Level 2 topology rules: no internal gaps or overlaps in MapUnitPolys, boundaries of MapUnitPolys are covered by ContactsAndFaults PASS
2.4 All map units in MapUnitPolys have entries in DescriptionOfMapUnits table PASS
2.5 No duplicate MapUnit values in DescriptionOfMapUnit table PASS
2.6 Certain field values within required elements have entries in Glossary table PASS
2.7 No duplicate Term values in Glossary table PASS
2.8 All xxxSourceID values in required elements have entries in DataSources table PASS
2.9 No duplicate DataSources_ID values in DataSources table PASS

LEVEL 3--FULLY COMPLIANT

A LEVEL 3 GeMS database meets these additional criteria:
3.1 Table and field definitions beyond Level 2 conform to GeMS schema PASS
3.2 All MapUnitPolys and ContactsAndFaults based feature classes obey Level 3 topology rules: No ContactsAndFaults overlaps, self-overlaps, or self-intersections. PASS
3.3 No missing required values PASS
3.4 No missing terms in Glossary PASS
3.5 No unnecessary terms in Glossary PASS
3.6 No missing sources in DataSources PASS
3.7 No unnecessary sources in DataSources PASS
3.8 No map units without entries in DescriptionOfMapUnits PASS
3.9 No unnecessary map units in DescriptionOfMapUnits PASS
3.10 HierarchyKey values in DescriptionOfMapUnits are unique and well formed PASS
3.11 All values of GeoMaterial are defined in GeoMaterialDict. GeoMaterialDict is as specified in the GeMS standard PASS
3.12 No duplicate _ID values PASS
3.13 No zero-length, whitespace-only, or bad null values PASS

Warnings

There are 0 warnings

Content not specified in GeMS schema

Some of the extensions to the GeMS schema identified here may be necessary to capture geologic content and are entirely appropriate. Please document these extensions in metadata for the database, any accompanying README file, and (if applicable) any transmittal letter that accompanies the dataset. Other extensions may be intermediate datasets, fields, or files that should be deleted before distribution of the database.

Fields


OrientationPoints_Display, FieldID
OrientationPoints_Display, OrientationPoints_AllID
OrientationPoints_All, FieldID
OrientationPoints_All, OrientationPoints_DisplayID

Tables


MapOutline

Occurrence of MapUnit in DMU, feature datasets, or geopackage tables

MapUnit DescriptionOfMapUnits GeologicMap
CZib X X
CZmbcq X X
Qal X X
CZmg X X
CZmb X X
CZmgs X X
CZmbg X X
CZmbcp X X
Trtm X X
Trmp X X
CZmbb X X
CZum X X
water X X
Trmr X X
CZi X X
CZiq X X
CZmbq X X
Jd X X
CZicq X X

Contents of Nonspatial Tables

DataSources

OBJECTIDSourceNotesURLDataSources_ID
5Neuendorf et al., eds., 2011modified from Neuendorf, K.K.E., Mehl Jr., J.P., and Jackson, J.A., eds. 2011. Glossary of Geology (Fifth Edition, Revised). Alexandria, VA. American Geological Institute. 783 p.https://www.americangeosciences.org/pubs/glossaryAGI_2011
4FGDC, 2006Federal Geographic Data Committee [prepared for the Federal Geographic Data Committee by the U.S. Geological Survey], 2006, FGDC Digital Cartographic Standard for Geologic Map Symbolization: Reston, Va., Federal Geographic Data Committee Document Number FGDC-STD-013-2006, 290 p., 2 plates.https://ngmdb.usgs.gov/fgdc_gds/geolsymstd.phpFGDC-STD-013-2006
3definitions copied from GeMS, 2020U.S. Geological Survey National Cooperative Geologic Mapping Program, 2020, GeMS (Geologic Map Schema)—A standard format for the digital publication of geologic maps: U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods, book 11, chap. B10, 74 p., https://doi.org//10.3133/tm11B10.https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/tm11B10GeMS_2020
13Dingman, R.J., Meyer, G., and Martin, R.O.R., 1954Dingman, R.J., Meyer, G., and Martin, R.O.R., 1954. The water resources of Howard and Montgomery Counties: Maryland Department of Geology, Mines, and Water Resources, Bulletin 14, 260 p.http://www.mgs.md.gov/publications/report_pages/BULL_14.htmlMGS_Bull_14
20Muller, 1994Muller, P.D., 1994, Geologic map of the Finksburg Quadrangle, Carroll and Baltimore Counties: Maryland Geological Survey, scale 1:24,000.http://www.mgs.md.gov/publications/maps.htmlMGS_FINKS1994
1Kavage Adams, 2025Kavage Adams, R., 2025. Geologic Map of the Germantown Quadrangle, Montgomery County, Maryland. Maryland Geological Survey, Quadrangle Geologic Map, GERMA2025.1, scale 1:24,000.http://www.mgs.md.gov/publications/maps.htmlMGS_GERMA2025.1
12Cloos and Cooke, 1953Cloos, E., and Cooke, C.W., 1953. Geologic map of Montgomery County [Maryland] and the District of Columbia: Maryland Department of Geology, Mines and Water Resources, scale 1:62,500.http://jhir.library.jhu.edu/handle/1774.2/34596MGS_MODC1953
17Nutter, L.J., 1975Nutter, L.J., 1975, Hydrogeology of the Triassic rocks of Maryland: Maryland Geological Survey Report of Investigations No. 26, 37 p.http://www.mgs.md.gov/publications/report_pages/RI_26.htmlMGS_RI_26
7Kavage Adams, R., field observationsfield observations and interpretations by Rebecca Kavage Adams of the Maryland Geological SurveyNoneMGS_RKA
19Krol and Muller, 1995Krol, M.A., and Muller, P.D., 1995, Microstructural evidence for dextral shearing within the Pleasant Grove Zone, Maryland: Northeastern Geology and Environmental Sciences, v. 17, no. 2, p. 151-161.NoneNEGEOENV_v17_151
6National Hydrography DatasetU.S. Geological Survey, 2020, National Hydrography Dataset (NHD), accessed August 2023 at https://www.usgs.gov/national-hydrography/national-hydrography-datasethttps://www.usgs.gov/national-hydrography/national-hydrography-datasetNHD_2020
9Smoot and Robinson Jr., 1988Smoot, J.P., and Robinson, G.R. Jr., 1988. Base- and precious-metal occurrences in the Culpeper Basin, Northern Virginia, IN Froelich, A.J., and Robinson, G.R., Jr., eds., Studies of the early Mesozoic basins of the Eastern United States: U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin, Geology of the early Mesozoic basins of eastern North America, Reston, VA, May 11-14, 1987, 1776, p. 403-423.https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/b1776USGS_Bull_1776_403
21Gottfried and Froelich, 1985Gottfried, D., and Froelich, A.J., 1985. Geochemical and petrologic features of some Mesozoic diabase sheets in the Northern Culpeper Basin, IN Robinson, G.R., Jr., and Froelich, A.J., eds., Proceedings of the Second U.S. Geological Survey Workshop on the early Mesozoic basins of the eastern United States, U.S. Geological Survey Circular 946, Reston, VA, November 14-16, 1984, p. 86-91.https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/cir946USGS_CIR_946
22Southworth, 1998Southworth, C.S., 1998. Geologic map of the Poolesville quadrangle, Frederick and Montgomery Counties, Maryland, and Loudoun County, Virginia: U.S. Geological Survey Geologic Quadrangle Map GQ-1761, scale 1:24,000.https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/gq1761USGS_GQ_1761
23Southworth, 1999Southworth, C.S. 1999. Geologic map of the Urbana quadrangle, Frederick and Montgomery Counties, Maryland: U.S. Geological Survey Geologic Quadrangle Map GQ-1768, scale 1:24,000.https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/gq1768USGS_GQ_1768
24Drake et al., 1999Drake, A.A., Southworth, C.S., and Lee, K.Y., 1999. Geologic map of the Seneca quadrangle, Montgomery County, Maryland, and Fairfax and Loudoun Counties, Virginia: U.S. Geological Survey Geologic Quadrangle Map GQ-1802, scale 1:24,000.https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/gq1802USGS_GQ_1802
18Froelich, 1975Froelich, A.J., 1975, Map showing mineral resources of Montgomery County, Maryland: U.S. Geological Survey Miscellaneous Investigations Series, Map I-920-E, scale 1:62,500.https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/i920EUSGS_IMAP920_MO1975
8Southworth, C.S., field observationsfield observations and interpretations by Scott Southworth of the United States Geological SurveyNoneUSGS_ScottSouthworth
16Southworth et al., 2008Southworth, C.S., Brezinski, D.K., Drake, A.A., Burton, W.C., Orndorff, R.C., Froelich, A.J., Reddy, J.E., Denenny, Danielle, and Daniels, D.L., 2008, Geologic map of the Frederick 30' x 60' Quadrangle, Maryland, Virginia, and West Virginia. U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Map SIM-288https://pubs.usgs.gov/sim/2889/USGS_SIM_2889_FREDERICK

DescriptionOfMapUnits

OBJECTIDMapUnitNameFullNameAgeDescriptionHierarchyKeyParagraphStyleLabelSymbolAreaFillRGBAreaFillPatternDescriptionDescriptionSourceIDGeoMaterialGeoMaterialConfidenceDescriptionOfMapUnits_ID
1waterwaterwaterNoneNone01-01DMU Unit 2None30.02.29204,255,255NoneNoneWater or iceHighDMU01
2QalAlluviumAlluviumQuaternaryPoorly- to well-sorted, stratified mixtures of unconsolidated clay, silt, sand, gravel, and cobbles underlying floodplains of nearly all rivers and tributaries. Channels of tributaries are commonly incised into bedrock with alluvium covering exposed along the banks. Thickness of alluvium is highly variable, and is a function of bedrock, topography, and land-use practices. Thick deposits of alluvium are present where eroded sediment, due to agricultural practices of the 19th century and recent suburban development, has accumulated (Southworth et al., 2008). Buildups of eroded sediment also occur above historic mill dams.01-02DMU Unit 1Qal40255,255,179NoneMGS_GERMA2025.1|USGS_SIM_2889_FREDERICKAlluvial sedimentHighDMU02
3JdDiabase dikes and sillsDiabase dikes and sillsJurassicMedium to dark gray, medium-grained, equigranular, massive diabase that weathers to characteristic rounded boulders with a rusty orange-brown surface. The Boyds sheet is saucer-shaped and fine-grained at the margin (Gottfried and Froelich, 1985). Linear dike southwest of Germantown is largely concealed by recent suburban development. Dikes are mapped on presence of rounded boulders and location on previous geologic maps (Cloos and Cooke, 1953 and Froelich, 1975).02-01DMU Unit 1Jd99255,000,000NoneMGS_GERMA2025.1|MGS_MODC1953|USGS_IMAP920_MO1975Coarse-grained, mafic-composition intrusive igneous rockHighDMU03
4TrtmThermally metamorphosed rocksThermally metamorphosed rocksTriassicIncludes dusky blue to medium dark gray cordierite-spotted hornfels; grayish red meta-arkose, and pale pink to medium gray meta-conglomerate occuring as zoned contact aureole adjacent to diabase sill.02-02DMU Unit 1^tm178235,077,102NoneMGS_GERMA2025.1Contact-metamorphic rockHighDMU04
5NoneManassas SandstoneManassas SandstoneNoneNone03DMU-Heading1NoneNoneNoneNoneMGS_GERMA2025.1Mostly sandstoneHighDMU05
6TrmpPoolesville MemberManassas Sandstone, Poolesville MemberTriassicGray, grayish red, and reddish brown, fine- to coarse-grained, thick-bedded, arkosic, micaceous sandstone. Crossbeds and conglomeratic channel lags are present. Interbedded with reddish brown, thin-bedded, calcareous siltstone in fining-upward fluvial sequences. Thickness in Germantown area is estimated at 1700 ft (520 m). Contact with the underlying Reston Member is gradational.03-01DMU Unit 1^mp511153,235,235NoneMGS_GERMA2025.1Mostly sandstoneHighDMU06
7TrmrReston MemberManassas Sandstone, Reston MemberTriassicLight gray to grayish red and grayish pink conglomerate containing well-rounded to subrounded clasts of phyllite, schist, quartzite, metagraywacke, and quartz in a poorly-sorted, coarse-grained, arkosic sandstone matrix. Locally interbedded with pale reddish brown sandstone and siltstone. Clast angularity increases where basal conglomerate unconformably overlies metasedimentary rocks of the Marburg Formation along Great Seneca Creek. Thickness varies from approximately 20 to 250 feet (7-75 m).03-02DMU Unit 1^mr715102,153,235NoneMGS_GERMA2025.1Mostly sandstoneHighDMU07
8NoneIjamsville PhylliteIjamsville PhylliteProterozoic-CambrianGrayish purple to grayish blue phyllite with minor slate and bodies of metabasalt, quartzite, and conglomerate. Four lithologies are mapped on the Germantown Quadrangle.04DMU-Heading1NoneNoneNoneNoneMGS_GERMA2025.1Metamorphic rockHighDMU08
9CZiIjamsville Phyllite, undifferentiatedIjamsville Phyllite, undifferentiatedProterozoic-CambrianGrayish purple, grayish blue, and dark greenish gray phyllite containing white vein quartz and minor slate. Folded and sheared phyllonite with abundant folded micaceous quartz veins and epidote deposits is present near Barnesville-Monrovia Fault and Hyattstown Fault. Faults are mapped along NE-SW trending ridges on Route 109 and Peach Tree Ridge Road. Shear zone around faults is marked with wavy lines as shown in lower half of symbol.04-01DMU Unit 1_Zi312204,222,235705-K symbology in zones of phyllonitic alteration.MGS_GERMA2025.1Meta-felsic and intermediate rockHighDMU09
10CZibmetabasaltIjamsville Phyllite, metabasaltProterozoic-CambrianGreenish gray to dark greenish gray, schistose metabasalt. A small body is mapped in the northwest corner of the quadrangle along the Little Monocacy River and another mapped north of Comus is based on float.04-02DMU Unit 1_Zib466179,128,128NoneMGS_GERMA2025.1Meta-mafic rockHighDMU10
11CZiqquartziteIjamsville Phyllite, quartziteProterozoic-CambrianYellowish gray to olive green, fine- to medium-grained, massive quartzite locally intervening between phyllite and metabasalt. One body is mapped in the northwest corner of the quadrangle.04-03DMU Unit 1_Ziq478179,077,102NoneMGS_GERMA2025.1QuartziteHighDMU11
12CZicqconglomeratic quartziteIjamsville Phyllite, conglomeratic quartziteProterozoic-CambrianGreenish gray, medium- to coarse-grained conglomerate with glassy quartz pebbles and medium light gray phyllite chips. One small body is mapped north of Comus and is based on float.04-04DMU Unit 1_Zicq476179,128,102NoneMGS_GERMA2025.1Metasedimentary rockHighDMU12
13NoneMarburg FormationMarburg FormationProterozoic-CambrianLight to dark olive gray phyllite and metasiltstone with bodies of metagraywacke, metabasalt, quartzite, and chloritic phyllite. Six lithologies are mapped on the Germantown Quadrangle.05DMU-Heading1NoneNoneNoneNoneMGS_GERMA2025.1Metamorphic rockHighDMU13
14CZmbMarburg Formation, undifferentiatedMarburg Formation, undifferentiatedProterozoic-CambrianDark greenish gray to light olive gray, phyllitic metasiltstone containing thin, light gray, quartz laminae and ribbons; medium purplish gray to very pale orange, muscovite phyllite similar to that of the Ijamsville Phyllite with occasional siderite pseudomorphs after pyrite. Much of the unit is transposed, phyllonitized, and has abundant pods of white vein quartz with deposits of chlorite and epidote. Shear zone around fault is marked with wavy lines as shown in lower half of symbol.05-01DMU Unit 1_Zmb244222,179,179705-K symbology in zones of phyllonitic alteration.MGS_GERMA2025.1Metasedimentary rockHighDMU14
15CZmbqquartziteMarburg Formation, quartziteProterozoic-CambrianLight to medium bluish gray and light olive gray, coarse-grained, blocky to massive quartzite. Mapped south of Little Seneca Lake and along Bucklodge Branch.05-02DMU Unit 1_Zmbq404179,179,255NoneMGS_GERMA2025.1QuartziteHighDMU15
16CZmbgmetagraywackeMarburg Formation, metagraywackeProterozoic-CambrianGrayish green to black, schistose, blocky-weathering metagraywacke interbedded with dark gray phyllite. Mapped south of Little Seneca Lake and along Great Seneca Creek.05-03DMU Unit 1_Zmbg304204,179,235NoneMGS_GERMA2025.1Metasedimentary rockMediumDMU16
17CZmbcpchlorite phylloniteMarburg Formation, chlorite phylloniteProterozoic-CambrianGreenish gray, chlorite-sericite phyllite containing white vein quartz. Highly folded and sheared with abundant deformed quartz veins. It is mapped north of Great Seneca Creek on the western border of the Pleasant Grove Fault.05-04DMU Unit 1_Zmbcp584153,179,077NoneMGS_GERMA2025.1Deformation-related metamorphic rockHighDMU17
18CZmbbmetabasaltMarburg Formation, metabasaltProterozoic-CambrianGrayish-green, aphanitic metabasalt. One small body mapped along a tributary to Bucklodge Branch..05-05DMU Unit 1_Zmbb765102,153,128NoneMGS_GERMA2025.1Meta-mafic rockMediumDMU18
19CZmbcqconglomeratic quartziteMarburg Formation, conglomeratic quartziteProterozoic-CambrianGlassy, subangular, quartz pebbles, yellowish gray shale chips, and occasional euhedral magnetite grains (5 cm) in greenish gray matrix. Weathers moderate yellowish-brown, blocky to massive.05-06DMU Unit 1_Zmbcq475179,153,102NoneMGS_GERMA2025.1QuartziteHighDMU19
20NoneMather Gorge FormationMather Gorge FormationProterozoic-CambrianOlive green to dark greenish gray schist and metagraywacke with bodies of metagabbro and serpentinite. Three lithologies are mapped on the Germantown Quadrangle.06DMU-Heading1NoneNoneNoneNoneMGS_GERMA2025.1Metamorphic rockHighDMU20
21CZmgMather Gorge Formation, undifferentiatedMather Gorge Formation, undifferentiatedProterozoic-CambrianQuartz-mica schist and quartzitic metagraywacke interbedded in layers and lenses on a millimeter to meter scale. Quartz-muscovite-chlorite-plagioclase-epidote-magnetite garnet schist is fine-grained, lustrous greenish-gray to gray. Metagraywacke is light- to dark-olive-gray, fine- to medium-grained, with quartz pebbles and graded bedding occasionally visible. Stringers and pods of isoclinally folded and boudinaged white quartz veins are abundant.06-01DMU Unit 1_Zmg185235,153,077NoneMGS_GERMA2025.1Metasedimentary rockHighDMU21
22CZmgsMather Gorge Formation shearedMather Gorge Formation, shearedProterozoic-CambrianInterbedded quartz-mica schist and quartzitic metagraywacke with penetrative S-C metamorphic fabric, formed by the intersection of the dominant foliation (S) and the shear plane (C) near the Pleasant Grove Fault (Krol and Muller, 1995; Muller, 1994). Mapped on distinct appearance of rotated foliation; lithologically is similar to CZmg.06-02DMU Unit 1_Zmgs184235,179,077NoneMGS_GERMA2025.1|NEGEOENV_v17_151|MGS_FINKS1994Deformation-related metamorphic rockHighDMU22
23CZumUltramafic and mafic rocksUltramafic and mafic rocksProterozoic-CambrianUndifferentiated serpentine, magnesian schist, and metagabbro that occur within rocks of the Mather Gorge Formation. Grayish green to black, fine- to medium-grained serpentinite weathers to a rounded, soft, light gray surface. Very light gray to dark greenish gray actinolite-tremolite-chlorite schist often contains euhedral bladed crystals from 0.1 to 0.4 inch (3 mm to 1cm) in length. 0.1 to 0.2 inch (3 to 5 mm) euhedral magnetite grains occur in abundance within the serpentinite and magnesian schist. Very light gray and dark gray to black, medium- to coarse-grained metagabbro is comprised of plagioclase feldspar, hornblende, epidote, can have a speckled appearance, and weathers blocky.07DMU Unit 1_Zum442179,222,179NoneMGS_GERMA2025.1Meta-ultramafic rockHighDMU23

Glossary

OBJECTIDTermDefinitionDefinitionSourceIDGlossary_ID
9beddingFormed, arranged, or deposited in layers or beds, or made up of or occurring in the form of beds; esp. said of a layered sedimentary rock, deposit, or formation. The term has also been applied to nonsedimentary material that exhibits depositional layering, such as the "bedded deposits" of volcanic tuff alternating with lava in the mantle of a stratovolcano.AGI_2011GLO09
1certainIdentity of a feature can be determined using relevant observations and scientific judgment; therefore, one can be reasonably confident in the credibility of this interpretation.FGDC-STD-013-2006GLO01
10cleavageA locally planar fabric in an unmetamorphosed or weakly metamorphosed, fine-grained rock defined by either the tendency of a rock to split in a particular direction, a preferred orientation of crystal planes in mineral grains, or a preferred orientation of inequant grain shapes; it is a product of deformation or metamorphism.AGI_2011GLO10
8contactA plane or irregular surface between two different types or ages of rock, sediment or other geologic and stratigraphic units.AGI_2011GLO08
7cross sectionA plane or polyline along which a diagram is drawn showing the transected subsurface and topographic features and geology; specifically a vertical section drawn at right angles to the longer axis of a geologic feature.AGI_2011GLO07
6DMU-Heading1Header for non-MapUnit labels, bolded title, 11pt Times New Roman font. This format is used for formal units that are now shown on the map.MGS_GERMA2025.1GLO06
5DMU Unit 1Formation style, bolded title, 11pt Times New Roman font. This format is used for largest unit descriptions where units are not shown on map unit. Units mapped at the surface, and may or may not contain subunits.MGS_GERMA2025.1GLO05
23DMU Unit 2Water in DMU Table - shown in Explanation of Map Symbols table on PDF map.MGS_GERMA2025.1GLO19
13faultA discrete surface or zone of discrete surfaces separating two rock masses across which one mass has slid past the other.AGI_2011GLO13
17foldA curve or bend of a planar structure such as rock strata, bedding places, foliation, or cleavage.MGS_GERMA2025.1GLO17
11foliationA general term for a planar arrangement of textural or structural geatures in any type of rock, esp. the locally planar fabric in a rock defined by a fissility, a preferred orientation of crystal planes in mineral grains, a preferred orientation of inequant grain shapes, or from compositional banding. In igneous rocks, planar parallelism of flaky or tabular minerals and mineral aggregates, slabby xenoliths, or flattened vesicles as well as compositional layering. In metamorphic rocks, planar parallelism of flaky minerals and compositional layering.AGI_2011GLO11
3HighThe selected term in the GeoMaterial field (and its definition) adequately characterizes the overall lithologic nature of rocks and (or) sediments in the map unit.GeMS_2020GLO03
14jointA planar fracture, crack, or parting in a rock, without shear displacement.AGI_2011GLO14
12lineationA general, nongeneric term for a locally linear structure or facric in a rock, e.g. flow lines, scratches, striae, slickensides or slickenfibers on a single surface; linear arrangements of components in sediments; or axes of folds. Lineation in metamorphic rocks includes aligned rod-shaped and/or elongate mineral grains, crenulation fold axes, and the lines of intersection between bedding and cleavage or any two sets of oriented surfaces.AGI_2011GLO12
4MediumThe selected term in the GeoMaterial field (and its definition) generally characterizes the overall lithologic nature of rocks and (or) sediments in the map unit, but one or more significant but minor lithologies are not adequately described by the selected term.GeMS_2020GLO04
15neatlineMap OutlineMGS_GERMA2025.1GLO15
16phyllonitic alterationA zone that macroscopically resembles phyllite but that is formed by mechanical degradation (mylonization) of initially coarser rocks. Characteristic features are silky films of recrystallized mica or chlorite, smeared out along schistosity surfaces; and formation by dislocation metamorphism.AGI_2011|MGS_GERMA2025.1GLO16
2questionableIdentity of a feature cannot be determined using relevant observations and scientific judgment; therefore, one cannot be reasonably confident in the credibility of this interpretation. For example, IdentityConfidence = questionable is appropriate when a geologist reasons "I can see some kind of planar feature that separates map units in this outcrop, but I cannot be certain if it is a contact or a fault."FGDC-STD-013-2006GLO02
24recreational GPSField-based method to collect data observations. Collected using tablet and usually 30 ft accuracy confidence.MGS_GERMA2025.1GLO20
18waterlineLine denoting boundary of perrenial natural or manmade areas of surface water of adequate size to map, including streams, rivers, lakes, impoundments.MGS_GERMA2025.1GLO18

Database Inventory

This summary of database content is provided as a convenience to GIS analysts, reviewers, and others. It is not part of the GeMS compliance criteria.

DataSources, nonspatial table, 19 rows
DescriptionOfMapUnits, nonspatial table, 23 rows
GeoMaterialDict, nonspatial table, 101 rows
Glossary, nonspatial table, 20 rows
GeologicMap, feature dataset
MapUnitOverlayPolys, simple polygon feature class, 28 rows
MapUnitPolys, simple polygon feature class, 39 rows
OverlayPolys, simple polygon feature class, 2 rows
ContactsAndFaults, simple polyline feature class, 228 rows
OrientationPoints_Display, simple point feature class, 356 rows
CartographicLines, simple polyline feature class, 1 rows
OrientationPoints_All, simple point feature class, 931 rows
Stations, simple point feature class, 800 rows
MapOutline, simple polyline feature class, 1 rows