GeMS validation of SYKES2025.1.gdb

File written by GeMS_ValidateDatabase.py, version of 10/24/2024
Wed Dec 31 09:28:43 2025
Runtime parameters
Database path: \MD_2022_Sykesville2025.1_1-2-submittal\MD_2022_Sykesville2025.1_1-2\MD_2022_Sykesville2025.1_1-2-database\SYKES2025.1.gdb
Output directory: \MD_2022_Sykesville2025.1_1-2-submittal
Metadata file: None
Check embedded metadata: False
Skip topology check: False
Refresh GeoMaterialDict: False
Delete extra rows in Glossary and DataSources: False
Compact GDB: True

This database is LEVEL 3 COMPLIANT.

Check Metadata option was skipped. Be sure to have prepared valid metadata and check this option to produce a complete report.
This file should be accompanied by Sykesville.gdb-ValidationErrors.html and a metadata summary from mp in the same directory.

If this database will be submitted to the NGMDB, it also needs to be accompanied by a reviewed Geologic Names report that includes identification of any suggested modifications to Geolex. Use the Geologic Names Check tool to generate that report or provide other documentation of a review.

Back to Top

Contents

Compliance Criteria
Warnings
Content not specified in GeMS schema
Occurrence of MapUnits in DMU, feature datasets, or geopackage tables
Contents of Nonspatial Tables
DataSources
DescriptionOfMapUnits
Glossary
Database Inventory

Compliance Criteria

LEVEL 1

Criteria for a LEVEL 1 GeMS database are: Databases with a variety of schema may meet these criteria. This script cannot confirm LEVEL 1 compliance.

LEVEL 2--MINIMALLY COMPLIANT

A LEVEL 2 GeMS database is accompanied by a peer-reviewed Geologic Names report, including identification of suggested modifications to Geolex, and meets the following criteria:
2.1 Has required elements: nonspatial tables DataSources, DescriptionOfMapUnits, GeoMaterialDict; feature dataset GeologicMap with feature classes ContactsAndFaults and MapUnitPolys PASS
2.2 Required fields within required elements are present and correctly defined PASS
2.3 All MapUnitPolys and ContactsAndFaults based feature classes obey Level 2 topology rules: no internal gaps or overlaps in MapUnitPolys, boundaries of MapUnitPolys are covered by ContactsAndFaults PASS
2.4 All map units in MapUnitPolys have entries in DescriptionOfMapUnits table PASS
2.5 No duplicate MapUnit values in DescriptionOfMapUnit table PASS
2.6 Certain field values within required elements have entries in Glossary table PASS
2.7 No duplicate Term values in Glossary table PASS
2.8 All xxxSourceID values in required elements have entries in DataSources table PASS
2.9 No duplicate DataSources_ID values in DataSources table PASS

LEVEL 3--FULLY COMPLIANT

A LEVEL 3 GeMS database meets these additional criteria:
3.1 Table and field definitions beyond Level 2 conform to GeMS schema PASS
3.2 All MapUnitPolys and ContactsAndFaults based feature classes obey Level 3 topology rules: No ContactsAndFaults overlaps, self-overlaps, or self-intersections. PASS
3.3 No missing required values PASS
3.4 No missing terms in Glossary PASS
3.5 No unnecessary terms in Glossary PASS
3.6 No missing sources in DataSources PASS
3.7 No unnecessary sources in DataSources PASS
3.8 No map units without entries in DescriptionOfMapUnits PASS
3.9 No unnecessary map units in DescriptionOfMapUnits PASS
3.10 HierarchyKey values in DescriptionOfMapUnits are unique and well formed PASS
3.11 All values of GeoMaterial are defined in GeoMaterialDict. GeoMaterialDict is as specified in the GeMS standard PASS
3.12 No duplicate _ID values PASS
3.13 No zero-length, whitespace-only, or bad null values PASS

Warnings

There are 607 warnings

Content not specified in GeMS schema

Some of the extensions to the GeMS schema identified here may be necessary to capture geologic content and are entirely appropriate. Please document these extensions in metadata for the database, any accompanying README file, and (if applicable) any transmittal letter that accompanies the dataset. Other extensions may be intermediate datasets, fields, or files that should be deleted before distribution of the database.

Fields


Stations, ObservedMapUnit_Lith
OrientationPoints_Display, OrientationPointsAllID

Tables


Occurrence of MapUnit in DMU, feature datasets, or geopackage tables

MapUnit DescriptionOfMapUnits GeologicMap
Csy X X
Dw X X
Og X X
CZmgb X X
Cc X X
Dg X X
CZlo X X
Qc X X
Sp X X
Yb X X
CZum X X
CZloma X X
CZmgbf X X
CZs X X
CZg X X
Csq X X
Qal X X
CZmg X X

Contents of Nonspatial Tables

DataSources

OBJECTIDSourceNotesURLDataSources_ID
6Neuendorf, et al., eds., 2011modified from Neuendorf, K.K.E., Mehl Jr., J.P., and Jackson, J.A., eds. 2011. Glossary of Geology (Fifth Edition, Revised). Alexandria, VA. American Geological Institute. 783 p.https://www.americangeosciences.org/pubs/glossaryAGI_2011
7Aleinikoff, et al., 2002Aleinikoff, J.N., Horton, J.W., Drake, A.A., and Fanning, C.M., 2002, SHRIMP and conventional U-Pb ages of Ordovician granites and tonalites in the central Appalachian Piedmont: Implications for Paleozoic tectonic events: American Journal of Science, v. 302, no. 1, p. 50–75.https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/70209291AJI_2002_302.1.50
22Sinha, et al., 2012Sinha, A.K., Thomas, W.A., Hatcher, R.D., and Harrison, T.M., 2012, Geodynamic evolution of the central Appalachian orogen: Geochronology and compositional diversity of magmatism from Ordovician through Devonian: American Journal of Science, v. 312, no. 8, p. 907–966.https://ajsonline.org/article/61809AJI_2012_312.8.907
17Martin and Bosbyshell, 2019Martin, A.J., and Bosbyshell, H, 2019, Further detrital zircon evidence for peri-Gondwanan blocks in the central Appalachian Piedmont Province, USA: Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, v. 56, no. 10, p. 1061-1076.https://cdnsciencepub.com/doi/10.1139/cjes-2018-0253CJS_2019_56.10.1061
21Sawyer, 2008Sawyer, E., 2008, Atlas of Migmatites: Canadian Science Publishing, v. 9, 371p.https://cdnsciencepub.com/doi/book/10.1139/9780660197876CSP_2008_v9
5FGDC, 2006Federal Geographic Data Committee [prepared for the Federal Geographic Data Committee by the U.S. Geological Survey], 2006, FGDC Digital Cartographic Standard for Geologic Map Symbolization: Reston, Va., Federal Geographic Data Committee Document Number FGDC-STD-013-2006, 290 p., 2 plates.https://ngmdb.usgs.gov/fgdc_gds/geolsymstd.phpFGDC-STD-013-2006
4definitions copied from GeMS, 2020U.S. Geological Survey National Cooperative Geologic Mapping Program, 2020, GeMS (Geologic Map Schema)—A standard format for the digital publication of geologic maps: U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods, book 11, chap. B10, 74 p., https://doi.org//10.3133/tm11B10.https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/tm11B10GeMS_2020
19Muth, et al., 1979Muth, K.G., Arth, J.G., and Reed, J.C., Jr., 1979, A minimum age for the high grade metamorphism and granite intrusion in the Piedmont of the Potomac River gorge near Washington, D.C.: Geology, v. 7, no. 7, p. 349-350.https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/geology/article-abstract/7/7/349/188229/A-minimum-age-for-high-grade-metamorphism-and?redirectedFrom=fulltextGEOL_1979_7.7.349
16Martin, et al., 2015Martin, A.J., Southworth, C.S., Collins, J.C., Fisher, S.W., and Kingman, E.R., III, 2015, Laurentian and Amazonian sediment sources to Neoproterozoic–lower Paleozoic Maryland Piedmont rocks: Geosphere, v. 11, no. 4, p. 1042–1061.https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/geosphere/article/11/4/1042/132215/Laurentian-and-Amazonian-sediment-sources-toGEOS_2015_11.4.1042
12Kearns, 2018Kearns, C.A., 2018. The Mineralogy and Mineral Chemistry of the Henryton Pegmatite, Patapsco State Park, Carroll County, Maryland. Doctoral dissertation, George Mason University, 266 p.https://science.gmu.edu/media/ckearnspdfGMU_DD_CAK_2018
25Wetherill, et al., 1966Wetherill, G., Tilton, G., Davis, G., Hart, S., and Hopson, C., 1966, Age measurements in the Maryland Piedmont: Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 71, no. 8, p. 2139–2155.https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1029/JZ071i008p02139JGPR_1966_71.8.2139
13Jonas, A.I., 1928Jonas, A.I., 1928. Map of Carroll County showing the geological formations. Maryland Geological Survey, County Geologic Map, scale 1:62,500.http://www.mgs.md.gov/publications/maps.htmlMGS_CLGEO1928
24Singewald, 1946Singewald, Jr., J.T., 1946. Mineral Resources of Carroll and Frederick Counties. p. 132-162 in Physical Features of Carroll and Frederick Counties. Maryland Geological Survey County Report, 312 p.http://www.mgs.md.gov/publications/report_pages/County_Reports.htmlMGS_CR_CAFR1946_132
15Jonas and Stose, 1946Jonas, A.I., and Stose, G.W., 1946. Geology of Carroll and Frederick Counties, in Physical Features of Carroll and Frederick Counties: Maryland Geological Survey County Report, p. 11-138.http://www.mgs.md.gov/publications/report_pages/County_Reports.htmlMGS_CR_CLFR1946
3Brezinski, D.K., field observationsBrezinski, D.K., field data collection and interpretationsNoneMGS_DKB
18Muller, 1994Muller, P.D., 1994, Geologic map of the Finksburg Quadrangle, Carroll and Baltimore Counties: Maryland Geological Survey, scale 1:24,000.http://www.mgs.md.gov/publications/maps.htmlMGS_FINKS1994
14Jonas and Stose, 1938Jonas, A.I., and Stose, G.W., 1938a. Geologic map of Frederick County and adjacent parts of Washington and Carroll Counties: Maryland Geological Survey, scale 1:62,500.https://ngmdb.usgs.gov/Prodesc/proddesc_90332.htmMGS_FRWACL1938
9Cloos, et al., 1964Cloos, E., Fisher, G. W., Hopson, C. A., and Cleaves, E. T., 1964, The geology of Howard and Montgomery Counties: Maryland Geological Survey, 373p.http://www.mgs.md.gov/publications/report_pages/County_Reports.htmlMGS_HOWMO1964
23Singewald, 1928Singewald, Jr., J.T., 1928, Notes on feldspar, quartz, chrome, and manganese in Maryland: Maryland Geological Survey Reports, v. 12, p. 91–194.http://www.mgs.md.gov/publications/reports.htmlMGS_R_12.91
10Crowley, 1976Crowley, W.P., 1976, The Geology of the Crystalline Rocks near Baltimore and Its Bearing on the Evolution of the Eastern Maryland Piedmont: Maryland Geological Survey Report of Investigations 27, 40 p.http://www.mgs.md.gov/publications/report_pages/RI_27.htmlMGS_RI_27
2Kavage Adams, R., field observationsKavage Adams, R., field data collection and interpretationsNoneMGS_RKA
1Kavage Adams, 2025Kavage Adams, R., 2025. Geologic Map of the Sykesville Quadrangle, Howard, Carroll and Baltimore Counties, Maryland. Maryland Geological Survey, Quadrangle Geologic Map, SYKES2025.1, scale 1:24,000.http://www.mgs.md.gov/publications/maps.htmlMGS_SYKES2025.1
8Aleinikoff, et al., 2004Aleinikoff, J.N., Horton, J.W., Jr., Drake, A.A., Jr., Wintsch, R.P., Fanning, C.M., and Yi, K., 2004, Deciphering multiple Mesoproterozoic and Paleo- zoic events recorded in zircon and titanite from the Baltimore Gneiss, Maryland: SEM imaging, SHRIMP U-Pb geochronology, and EMP analysis, in Tollo, R.P., Corriveau, L., McLelland, J., and Bartholomew, M.J., eds., Proterozoic Tectonic Evolution of the Grenville Orogen in North America: Society of America Memoir 197, p. 411–434.https://www.usgs.gov/publications/deciphering-multiple-mesoproterozoic-and-paleozoic-events-recorded-zircon-and-titaniteSoA_2004_Mem197_411
20Pearre and Heyl, 1960Pearre, N.C., and Heyl, A.V., 1960, Chromite and other mineral deposits in serpentine rocks of the Piedmont upland, Maryland, Pennsylvania, and Delaware: U.S.Geological Survey Bulletin 1082-K, p. 707-833, plate 40, scale 1:125,000.https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/b1082KUSGS_Bull_1082K_707
11Drake, 1994Drake, A.A., Jr., 1994, The Soldiers Delight Ultramafite in the Maryland Piedmont: U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 2076, p. A1–A14.https://ngmdb.usgs.gov/Prodesc/proddesc_92817.htmUSGS_Bull_2076_A1

DescriptionOfMapUnits

OBJECTIDMapUnitNameFullNameAgeDescriptionHierarchyKeyParagraphStyleLabelSymbolAreaFillRGBAreaFillPatternDescriptionDescriptionSourceIDGeoMaterialGeoMaterialConfidenceDescriptionOfMapUnits_ID
1QalAlluviumAlluviumQuaternaryPoorly to well-sorted, stratified mixtures of unconsolidated clay, silt, sand, gravel, and cobbles underlying flood plains of nearly all rivers and tributaries. Channels of tributaries are incised into bedrock with alluvium covering and exposed along the banks. Thickness of alluvium is highly variable, and is a function of bedrock, topography, and land-use practices. Abundant deposits of alluvium are present along Benson Branch, the Little and Middle Patuxent Rivers, and the North and South Branches of the Patapsco River.01-01DMU Unit 1Qal40255,255,179NoneMGS_SYKES2025.1Alluvial sedimentHighDMU01
2QcColluviumColluviumQuaternaryCoarse cobbles, boulders and large blocks of quartzite, pegmatite, and granitic gneiss. Typically derived from massive Setters Formation, Sykesville Formation, and pegmatite lithologies that were transported by gravity. Abundant on steeper slopes in the Patapsco River valley.01-02DMU Unit 1Qc62255,222,128NoneMGS_SYKES2025.1Colluvium and other widespread mass-movement sedimentHighDMU02
3DgGuilford GraniteGuilford GraniteDevonianMassive, light gray, fine- to medium-grained, equigranular granite with occasional xenoliths of biotite schist. Weathers into large, rounded boulders. U-Pb dating of zircon from the Guilford Granite yielded an age of 362±3 Ma (Aleinikoff et al., 2002).02-01DMU Unit 1Dg245222,153,179NoneMGS_SYKES2025.1|AJI_2002_302.1.50Fine-grained, felsic-composition intrusive igneous rockHighDMU03
4DwWoodstock GraniteWoodstock GraniteDevonianMassive, light gray, medium-grained, weakly foliated granite. Intrudes outcrops of the Baltimore Gneiss on the northeastern edge of the quadrangle. U-Pb dating of zircon from the Woodstock Granite yielded an age of 381±11 Ma (Sinha et al., 2012).03-01DMU Unit 1Dw234222,179,204NoneMGS_SYKES2025.1|AJI_2012_312.8.907Fine-grained, felsic-composition intrusive igneous rockHighDMU04
5SpPegmatitePegmatiteSilurianMassive, very coarse-grained, gray (smoky) quartz, light pinkish to grayish white feldspar (microcline and albite; Kearns, 2018), and grayish green muscovite with accessory garnet. Large blocks and boulders commonly mantle hillslopes below outcrops. Two historic quarry wall exposures of light pink, fine grained aplite just west of Marriottsville Road are mapped with pegmatite. Forms 1 to 150 feet (0.3 to 50 m) wide, cross-cutting bodies in rocks of the Baltimore Gneiss, Setters Formation, Cockeysville Marble, and Loch Raven Schist that were quarried and mined for feldspar in the early 1900s (Singewald, 1928). The largest is the Henryton Pegmatite, 0.6 mi (1.0 km) west of Marriottsville. Rb-Sr dating of total feldspar from the Henryton pegmatite yielded an age of 425±20 Ma (Wetherill et al., 1966).04-01DMU Unit 1Sp479179,000,102NoneMGS_SYKES2025.1|GMU_DD_CAK_2018|MGS_R_12.91|JGPR_1966_71.8.2139Coarse-grained, felsic-composition intrusive igneous rockHighDMU05
6OgGranodiorite (Ordovician?)GranodioriteOrdovicianLight gray, fine-grained, muscovite-biotite granodiorite composed largely of plagioclase feldspar, with lesser quartz and mica. Forms 3 to 6 feet (1 to 2 m) thick, cross-cutting bodies in rocks of the Mather Gorge and Sykesville Formations. Minimum age is estimated at 469±20 Ma based on Rb-Sr dating (Muth et al., 1979). Seen in the northwest corner of the quadrangle near Piney Branch and on an old railroad cut west of the town of Sykesville.05-01DMU Unit 1Og1255,235,255NoneMGS_SYKES2025.1|GEOL_1979_7.7.349Fine-grained, felsic-composition intrusive igneous rockHighDMU06
7CcCockeysville MarbleCockeysville MarbleCambrianWhite to yellowish gray, fine- to medium-grained, marble and metadolostone with interlayed bands of yellowish brown phlogopite. Outcrop exposure is limited to interlayered schistose marble with phlogopite. Float blocks of massive, homogenous, white marble are found near old quarries and kiln sites, and is presumed to underlie valleys between outcrops of the Setters Formation and schistose marble. Abundant meter-scale folding is visible in outcrops near the North and South Branch of the Patapsco and Middle Pautuxent Rivers. The thickness of the Cockeysville Marble is estimated at 350 ft (107 m) along the South Branch of the Patapsco River. This estimate is not equivalent to true stratigraphic thickness of the formation due to deformation.06-01DMU Unit 1_c603128,204,255NoneMGS_SYKES2025.1Meta-carbonate rockHighDMU07
8CsqSetters FormationSetters FormationCambrianLight gray, fine to medium-grained quartzite and interlayered schist (quartz-feldspar-muscovite-tourmaline). Quartzite layers are typically 0.5 to 3 in (2 to 6 cm) thick, parting on thin schistose bands covered in medium to coarse-grained muscovite and tourmaline. Quartzite of the Setters Formation commonly splits into flaggy slabs. Currently and historically quarried in the Marriottsville area (Singewald, 1946). Portions of the formation are predominantly schist with minor quartzite but are poorly exposed in the map area. The overall thickness of the formation in the map area ranges from 10 to 500 ft (3 to 160 m), the lower limit due to lack of exposure. Antiformal and synformal folds from 20 to 4000 ft amplitude are observable in outcrops and topography, respectively, of the Setters Formation. U-Pb dating of detrital zircon from the Setters Formation west of the Woodstock Gneiss dome yielded a maximum depositional age of 1 Ga (Martin et al., 2015). The thickness of the Setters Formation is estimated at 460 ft (140 m) along the South Branch of the Patapsco River. This estimate is not equivalent to true stratigraphic thickness of the formation due to deformation.07-01DMU Unit 1_sq52255,222,153NoneMGS_SYKES2025.1|MGS_CR_CAFR1946_132|GEOS_2015_11.4.1042QuartziteHighDMU08
9CsySykesville FormationSykesville FormationLower CambrianVariegated, olive to pinkish gray, granitic-looking matrix containing abundant small 0.04 to 2 inch (1 mm to 5 cm) fragments of quartz and dark gray schist. Weathers into massive, rounded outcrops and boulders. Locally contains coarse, angular fragments of metagraywacke, quartz-rich schist, amphibolite and banded schist ranging from 2 inches to 30 feet (5 cm to 9 m) in size. Felsic veins with sharp to diffuse boundaries commonly surround and cross-cut dark gray fragments of schist. Clast shape and orientation is heterogeneous in some outcrops and aligned with foliation in others. Strongly developed foliation and lineation comprised of dark gray schist and light gray felsic banding from 0.08 to 0.4 inch (2 mm-1 cm) in thickness, often with gneissic appearance, abundant 0.4 to 1.2 inch (1 to 3 cm) stretched quartz clasts with that form “eyes”. Exposed in the northwest corner of the quadrangle in Piney Branch and marked with a lineated pattern as seen in the lower half of the symbol. U-Pb dating of detrital zircon of the Sykesville Formation from the town of Sykesville yielded a maximum depositional age of 550 Ma (Martin et al., 2015). The thickness of the Sykesville Formation is estimated at 14,850 ft (4,526 m) along the South Branch of the Patapsco River. Apparent thickness is not equivalent to the true stratigraphic thickness of the formation due to deformation.08-01DMU Unit 1_sy121235,235,222NoneMGS_SYKES2025.1|GEOS_2015_11.4.1042Metasedimentary rockHighDMU09
10CZmgMather Gorge FormationMather Gorge FormationLower Cambrian and (or) NeoproterozoicQuartz-rich schist and quartzitic metagraywacke interbedded in layers ranging from 0.1 inch to 3 feet thick (2.5 mm to 1 m). Schist is very fine grained and greenish gray to gray, with muscovite, chlorite, plagioclase, epidote, magnetite ± garnet. Metagraywacke is light to dark olive gray, fine- to medium-grained. Equivalent to the Peters Creek Schist of Jonas and Stose (1946), the Wissahickon Formation, Western Sequence, psammatic rocks of Cloos et al. (1964), and the Morgan Run Formation of Muller (1994). U-Pb dating of detrital zircon from the Mather Gorge Formation at Hoods Mill yielded maximum depositional ages of 540 and 550 Ma (Martin et al., 2015; Martin and Bosbyshell, 2019).09-01DMU Unit 1_Zmg185235,153,077NoneMGS_SYKES2025.1|MGS_CR_CLFR1946|MGS_HOWMO1964|MGS_FINKS1994|GEOS_2015_11.4.1042|CJS_2019_56.10.1061Schist and gneiss, of sedimentary-rock originHighDMU10
11CZmgbbanded schist with interlayered metagraywackeMather Gorge Formation, banded schist with interlayered metagraywackeLower Cambrian and (or) NeoproterozoicInterbedded quartz-mica schist and quartzitic metagraywacke with intermittent zones of banded schist. The banded schist contains mm to cm-scale light gray to white and dark gray to black layers interpreted as in-situ leucosome (light layers) and melanosome (dark layers) produced by partial melting of the parent material (Sawyer, 2008). Metagraywacke remains similar in appearance to CZmg but is often surrounded by cm-scale zones of light gray to white quartz. Weathering form of outcrops with banded schist is more massive and rounded than CZmg, and foliation is less apparent.09-01-01DMU Unit 2_Zmgb186235,128,077NoneMGS_SYKES2025.1|CSP_2008_v9Schist and gneiss, of sedimentary-rock originHighDMU11
12CZmgbfbanded schist with metagraywacke fragmentsMather Gorge Formation, banded schist with metagraywacke fragmentsLower Cambrian and (or) NeoproterozoicBanded, light gray to white and dark gray to black, commonly contorted, schist. Metagraywacke fragments, similar in appearance to CZmg, 1 to 3 feet (0.3 to 1 m) long, are surrounded by banded schist. Also contains 0.25 to 1 foot (10 to 40 cm) thick, felsic bands containing abundant small schist clasts, similar in appearance to Csy. Interpreted to be produced by partial melting of quartz-mica schist and quartzitic metagraywacke (Sawyer, 2008). Cross-cutting, cm-scale, bands are white to very pale orange and comprised of mm-cm size crystals of plagioclase feldspar, quartz, and muscovite. These felsic bands sometimes contain clasts of schist and metagraywacke and are interpreted as in-situ or in-source leucosome (Sawyer, 2008).09-01-02DMU Unit 2_Zmgbf187235,102,077NoneMGS_SYKES2025.1|CSP_2008_v9Schist and gneiss, of sedimentary-rock originHighDMU12
13CZloLoch Raven-Oella Formation, undifferentiatedLoch Raven-Oella Formation, undifferentiatedCambrianLight to medium gray, medium- to coarse-grained, schist containing biotite-plagioclase-muscovite-quartz ± euhedral garnet, staurolite, and kyanite. Garnet is locally 0.5 in (1 cm) in size and covers foliation surfaces. The thickness of the Loch Raven-Oella Formation is estimated at 1,930 ft (588 m) along the South Branch of the Patapsco River. This estimate is not equivalent to true stratigraphic thickness of the formation due to deformation.09-02DMU Unit 1_Zlo546153,128,179NoneMGS_SYKES2025.1Schist and gneiss, of sedimentary-rock originHighDMU13
14CZlomameta-areniteLoch Raven-Oella Formation, meta-areniteCambrianLight gray, fine-grained quartzite with fine bands of biotite every 0.3 to 0.6 in (1 to 2 cm), ranging from 0.1 inch to 1.5 feet thick (2.5 mm to 0.5 m). Interlayered with dark gray, medium-grained schist. Similar in appearance to CZmg but occurs east of Soldiers Delight ultramafite. Equivalent to the Peters Creek schist of Jonas and Stose (1946), Wissahickon Formation, Eastern Sequence, psammatic rocks, of Cloos et al. (1964), and portions of the Oella Formation of Crowley (1976).09-02-01DMU Unit 2_Zloma122235,222,222NoneMGS_SYKES2025.1|MGS_CR_CLFR1946|MGS_HOWMO1964|MGS_RI_27Schist and gneiss, of sedimentary-rock originHighDMU14
15CZumUltramafic rocksUltramafic rocksLower Cambrian and (or) NeoproterozoicGreenish gray to black, occur as large bodies or smaller blocks within rocks of the Mather Gorge, Sykesville, and Loch Raven-Oella undifferentiated Formations. The cores of the bodies are comprised of dark green to black, medium-grained serpentinite with a rounded, often light gray, fractured weathering surface. The margins are typically magnesian schist. The largest of these is the Soldiers Delight ultramafite (Drake, 1994), which transects the quadrangle from NE to SW and is estimated at 2,350 ft (716 m) thickness at Marriottsville Road #2. This estimate is not equivalent to true stratigraphic thickness of the formation due to deformation. May include magnesian schist (CZs) and metagabbro (CZg) lithologies.10-01-01DMU Unit 1_Zum440179,255,179NoneMGS_SYKES2025.1|USGS_Bull_2076_A1Meta-ultramafic rockHighDMU15
16CZsMagnesian schistMagnesian schistLower Cambrian and (or) NeoproterozoicSoft, very light gray to dark greenish gray, fine- to coarse-grained talcose schist with occasional euhedral biotite, actinolite, and tremolite from 0.1 to 0.4 inch (3 mm to 1 cm) in length. 0.1 to 0.2 inch (3 to 5 mm) euhedral magnetite grains can occur in abundance. The weathering surface appears foliated. Found within Sykesville Formation and comprises part of the Soldiers Delight Ultramafite. Historically quarried for soapstone and talc near Marriottsville (Singewald, 1946; Perre and Heyl, 1960).10-01-02DMU Unit 1_Zs310204,255,235NoneMGS_SYKES2025.1|MGS_CR_CAFR1946_132|USGS_Bull_1082K_707Meta-ultramafic rockHighDMU16
17CZgMetagabbro and amphiboliteMetagabbro and amphiboliteLower Cambrian and (or) NeoproterozoicVery light gray and dark gray to black, medium- to coarse-grained plagioclase feldspar, hornblende, epidote. Weathering form is massive. Found within the Sykesville Formation and comprises part of the Soldiers Delight Ultramafite.10-01-03DMU Unit 1_Zg443179,204,179NoneMGS_SYKES2025.1Meta-mafic rockHighDMU17
18YbBaltimore GneissBaltimore GneissMesoproterozoicLight gray to white and dark gray to black, alternating felsic and mafic bands of biotite, feldspar, quartz, and plagioclase typically 0.1 to 1 in (3 mm to 2 cm) in thickness. Thicker light gray felsic bands (2 to 5 in / 5 to 10 cm) are present parallel to and cross cutting thinner banding. 1 to 3 ft (0.3 to 1 m) layers of dark gray schist with bands of light gray, stretched quartz feldspar lenses (augen or eyes) 0.5 to 1 in (1 to 2 cm) occur. 1 to 3 ft (0.3 to 1 m) thick, friable-weathering, layers of dark-gray to black hornblende-biotite schist occur intermittently in outcrops in the Patapsco River between Woodstock and Marriottsville. Where visible they define folds and faults. U-Pb dating of zircon from the Baltimore Gneiss yielded an age of 1.25 Ga (Aleinikoff et al., 2004).11-01DMU Unit 1Yb653128,204,153NoneMGS_SYKES2025.1|SoA_2004_Mem197_411Metaigneous rockMediumDMU18

Glossary

OBJECTIDTermDefinitionDefinitionSourceIDGlossary_ID
10beddingFormed, arranged, or deposited in layers or beds, or made up of or occurring in the form of beds; esp. said of a layered sedimentary rock, deposit, or formation. The term has also been applied to nonsedimentary material that exhibits depositional layering, such as the "bedded deposits" of volcanic tuff alternating with lava in the mantle of a stratovolcano.AGI_2011GLO10
1certainIdentity of a feature can be determined using relevant observations and scientific judgment; therefore, one can be reasonably confident in the credibility of this interpretation.FGDC-STD-013-2006GLO01
11cleavageA locally planar fabric in an unmetamorphosed or weakly metamorphosed, fine-grained rock defined by either the tendency of a rock to split in a particular direction, a preferred orientation of crystal planes in mineral grains, or a preferred orientation of inequant grain shapes; it is a product of deformation or metamorphism.AGI_2011GLO11
9contactA plane or irregular surface between two different types or ages of rock, sediment or other geologic and stratigraphic units.AGI_2011GLO09
8cross section lineA plane or polyline along which a diagram is drawn showing the transected subsurface and topographic features and geology; specifically a vertical section drawn at right angles to the longer axis of a geologic feature.AGI_2011GLO08
19desktop analysisData added to the digital geologic map through desktop methods for the purpose of clarification or to indicate general locations of objects or places.MGS_SYKES2025.1GLO19
5DMU Unit 1Formation style, bolded title, 11pt Times New Roman font. This format is used for both formal and major informal units that are mapped at the surface, and may or may not contain subunits.MGS_SYKES2025.1GLO05
6DMU Unit 2Informal formation or subunit style, bolded title, 11pt Times New Roman font. This format is used for visible map units that are informal units or are subunits of another visible map unit.MGS_SYKES2025.1GLO06
12faultA discrete surface or zone of discrete surfaces separating two rock masses across which one mass has slid past the other.AGI_2011GLO12
13fold axisA line which, when moved parallel to itself, traces out a folded surface. It applies only in the case of cylindrical folds.AGI_2011GLO13
14foliationA general term for a planar arrangement of textural or structural geatures in any type of rock, esp. the locally planar fabric in a rock defined by a fissility, a preferred orientation of crystal planes in mineral grains, a preferred orientation of inequant grain shapes, or from compositional banding. In igneous rocks, planar parallelism of flaky or tabular minerals and mineral aggregates, slabby xenoliths, or flattened vesicles as well as compositional layering. In metamorphic rocks, planar parallelism of flaky minerals and compositional layering.AGI_2011GLO14
3HighThe selected term in the GeoMaterial field (and its definition) adequately characterizes the overall lithologic nature of rocks and (or) sediments in the map unit.GeMS_2020GLO03
15jointA planar fracture, crack, or parting in a rock, without shear displacement.AGI_2011GLO15
16lineationA general, nongeneric term for a locally linear structure or facric in a rock, e.g. flow lines, scratches, striae, slickensides or slickenfibers on a single surface; linear arrangements of components in sediments; or axes of folds. Lineation in metamorphic rocks includes aligned rod-shaped and/or elongate mineral grains, crenulation fold axes, and the lines of intersection between bedding and cleavage or any two sets of oriented surfaces.AGI_2011GLO16
4MediumThe selected term in the GeoMaterial field (and its definition) generally characterizes the overall lithologic nature of rocks and (or) sediments in the map unit, but one or more significant but minor lithologies are not adequately described by the selected term.GeMS_2020GLO04
7neatlineMap OutlineMGS_SYKES2025.1GLO07
2questionableIdentity of a feature cannot be determined using relevant observations and scientific judgment; therefore, one cannot be reasonably confident in the credibility of this interpretation. For example, IdentityConfidence = questionable is appropriate when a geologist reasons "I can see some kind of planar feature that separates map units in this outcrop, but I cannot be certain if it is a contact or a fault."FGDC-STD-013-2006GLO02
18recreational GPSData collected using Apple iPad using GIS software such as ESRI Field Maps or IGIS with settings of 30 ft point accuracy.MGS_SYKES2025.1GLO18
17shear zoneA parallel-sided zone of localized shearing displacement, which may be recognized by sigmoidal mineral-filled veins, locally well-developed cleavage or foliation, wholesale grain-size reduction or mylonitization, or some combination of these features.AGI_2011GLO17

Database Inventory

This summary of database content is provided as a convenience to GIS analysts, reviewers, and others. It is not part of the GeMS compliance criteria.

DataSources, nonspatial table, 25 rows
DescriptionOfMapUnits, nonspatial table, 18 rows
GeoMaterialDict, nonspatial table, 101 rows
Glossary, nonspatial table, 19 rows
GeologicMap, feature dataset
MapUnitOverlayPolys, simple polygon feature class, 94 rows
CartographicLines, simple polyline feature class, 1 rows
Stations, simple point feature class, 615 rows
GeologicLines, simple polyline feature class, 34 rows
OrientationPoints_Display, simple point feature class, 206 rows
OrientationPoints_All, simple point feature class, 365 rows
MapUnitPolys, simple polygon feature class, 97 rows
ContactsAndFaults, simple polyline feature class, 850 rows
OverlayPolys, simple polygon feature class, 1 rows